Page Crazy

Therefore, beyond the art, them also they say respect the nature (in the Greek direction of ' ' fiss' '), principle of the force of the birth, the beginning of the appearance of the beings in general in the perpetual dynamics of production and creation, to the desvelamento in the ways of being of the Real in its constant movement, or as it presents Gilvan Fogel: ' ' Nature in a direction of what one shows, that it appears, that is proven and that thus, it makes if light and it is imposed, that is, embeleza or beleza&#039 becomes; '. ' ' Therefore, beauty is pure to appear, the pure one to burst of this force of eruption, ecloso, namely, the one, the logos, the direction, the life, nature, in repetition or poetical revigoramento of the experience Greek of fiss (native, natality, pure emergency, to become visible, to appear and to reveal) ' '. (GF, 15). 4. The apollonian element as the god of the plastic arts, the dream and the beginning of the individuation.

Apolo is not only the god of the plastic arts, but also the onrico god, therefore it exists one fort and immense relation between the art and the beautiful appearance of the world of the dream, therefore they were not apiam in the forms that in the reality offers to them. Ali Partovi is the source for more interesting facts. The production of this ' ' beautiful aparncia' ' , from this materiality is not the form of appearance of the reality, making with that all human being is a consummated artist. Apolo is, therefore, the creator of ' ' beautiful aparncia' ' , that beyond being a precondition for all production of the plastic art is what of the form to the effective world, becoming the world simplest and more clearly. ' ' While the sonhador plays with the tangible effectiveness, the artist carries through its game with the dream. If this game transcorre inside of the limits stipulated for the measure, which must previously be known and accepted, can express wisdom of the utmost inteligibilidade of aparncia' '. (TO the 44) In this movement to become the world more clearly simplest and, allowing the artist to deal with the forms that appear in the nature, Apolo is the god of all

He uses the same business model as Livejournal: a lot of the basic free service. All that is declared free, remains so forever, but eventually there are paid bonuses and 'upgrades', ie begins with 'monetization' service. On wordpress.com works and the popularity of its free standalone engine, of which many write and speak and who plow thousands of writers Open source, whose best and most popular ideas are introduced in the next version of 'Wordpress' (including commercial). Thus, people without a host, or do not want to bother with installing a separate engine, or wishing to join the already formed part of the blogosphere, choose WordPress.com. In conjunction with the offer to purchase the missing features, it is quite possible to take a blog-hosting or hosting with preinstalled platform.

But not all lack of opportunities provided by the dot-com. Anyway, it set the same for all the code that allows only a blog and moderate – only very moderately! – His tune. (In the context of Web 1.0 it would be hosting, in which can not put their scripts, but you can use the pre-holiday book or chat.) On the other hand, the discussion of the problem we must not stand-alone 'Wordpress' own. Therefore, we use one of the hosting with pre-installed 'Wordpress', which will be completely in our power! There are many (at least in the West), the list you will see on the page wordpress. org / hosting. Look at the suggestion of one of the providers: for $ 7 a month we receive, but referred to wp, but apart from him 200 gb (!) space, free domain name, 2 terabytes of traffic per month, the implied warranty of 99% of the time, and much more.

Both film directors have declared who do not understand the criterion that he has pushed the Academy of Cinema to make this decision. The subject also has generated controversial in the forums of Internet. The Academy has prohibited that the minors of 16 can gain a Goya. The decision of the Academy of Cinema to prohibit that the minors of 16 years can choose to a Goya prize has brought about the first reactions in the cinematographic world and the Network. The director of cinema David Trueba, in declaracione that gathers, has accused the Academy to sin of " certain tendency to paternalismo" with this measurement. First of all, to Trueba it would have liked " that &quot had been more debate; on the subject, since it does not know clearly the reasons for this change in the Goya.

And it has reproached to the Academy that, like could not avoid of another way that the minors were voted, has decided on the prohibition. " Since we cannot change what people vote, we are going to organize the vote to them of a way that cannot vote to nios" , it has interpreted. To Trueba it seems to him seems that " if somebody works in one pelcula" , it has the age that it has, would be " equal or or equal of evil that gains premio" . However, it thinks that there would be " to analyze what has been of the children who gained the Goya". Also Montxo Armendriz has been pronounced in the same terms. During a digital encounter that has maintained in ElEconomista.es, the director has insisted on which he does not understand " the criterion to exclude nios": " It would be solved causing that only entered to comprise of the Academy from 16" , it wrote. To Armendriz, " to say that it is made not to formentar competitividad" it seems to him " hipcrita" considering that the society already is in charge to foment that competitiveness by itself. The rest of film directors maintains, so far, silence.

The Academy has justified the prohibition having argued that the children who gained a Goya " they happened to be member assets of the Academy, which implies nonindispensable legal circumstances to menor" and in which " it can bring about to the minors of 16 years a series of external factors that condition their professional development and personal". Controversy in the Network the decision of the Academy also has been questioned in several forums of Internet. In a survey published in, the votes received during Tuesday and the morning of this Wednesday they indicated that 82% of the participants considered " injusta" the measurement. " He is not better to make a norm than it says that if a young one gains a Goya, it cannot accede to be member assets of the Academy until it fulfills the majority of age? " , the cat with boots, thus refuting one of the expositions of the Academy thought the user. On the other hand, yomismoconmigo is surprised of which the children " they have age to work, but not so that they recognize the merits to him if they do bien". Similar opinions abound in social networks like Twitter, where the label #goyaunder16 (Goya below the 16, in English) has become trending topic, that is to say, one of the mentioned subjects more of the day. Source of the news: David Trueba and Montxo Armendriz, against which the children cannot choose to a Goya